Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Catch bad naming style (and length) in assign() + setGeneric() usages #2766

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
Feb 25, 2025

Conversation

MichaelChirico
Copy link
Collaborator

Closes #1665. Also progress on #2737

Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 25, 2025

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 99.59%. Comparing base (84959ac) to head (d4c50c3).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #2766   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   99.59%   99.59%           
=======================================
  Files         125      125           
  Lines        6835     6835           
=======================================
  Hits         6807     6807           
  Misses         28       28           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@AshesITR AshesITR merged commit 3a1e48b into main Feb 25, 2025
21 checks passed
@AshesITR AshesITR deleted the name-assign-generic branch February 25, 2025 20:49
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

object_name_linter() doesn't lint assign() and setGeneric() calls
2 participants