Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[Feature] Usage of cached Lambda Expressions #80

Merged
merged 7 commits into from
May 16, 2017

Conversation

jogibear9988
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

So a cached LambdaExpression could be used
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented May 15, 2017

Codecov Report

Merging #80 into master will increase coverage by 0.39%.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master      #80      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   83.23%   83.62%   +0.39%     
==========================================
  Files          25       25              
  Lines        3000     3072      +72     
  Branches      448      448              
==========================================
+ Hits         2497     2569      +72     
  Misses        375      375              
  Partials      128      128
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...em.Linq.Dynamic.Core/DynamicQueryableExtensions.cs 96.97% <100%> (+0.41%) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 1fb5134...b1c54d5. Read the comment docs.

@StefH StefH changed the title Usage of cached Lambda Expressions [Feature] Usage of cached Lambda Expressions May 16, 2017
@StefH
Copy link
Collaborator

StefH commented May 16, 2017

I'll wait wait merge until you are ready...

@jogibear9988
Copy link
Contributor Author

Now I'm ready...

@jogibear9988
Copy link
Contributor Author

I've also fixed that Single and Last did not support querys with parameters!

@StefH
Copy link
Collaborator

StefH commented May 16, 2017

Can you also check if you can fix the code-coverage?

@jogibear9988
Copy link
Contributor Author

done

@jogibear9988
Copy link
Contributor Author

Is it ok so that it can be merged?

@StefH
Copy link
Collaborator

StefH commented May 16, 2017

I'll have a detailed look today.

@StefH StefH merged commit c21b1be into zzzprojects:master May 16, 2017
@jogibear9988
Copy link
Contributor Author

Will you create a new nuget?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants