Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Remove option for 'UseDynamicObjectClassForAnonymousTypes' #353

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Feb 26, 2020

Conversation

StefH
Copy link
Collaborator

@StefH StefH commented Feb 26, 2020

@StefH StefH self-assigned this Feb 26, 2020
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 26, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #353 into master will increase coverage by 0.26%.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##           master    #353      +/-   ##
=========================================
+ Coverage   88.13%   88.4%   +0.26%     
=========================================
  Files          46      46              
  Lines        4500    4484      -16     
=========================================
- Hits         3966    3964       -2     
+ Misses        534     520      -14
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
...ystem.Linq.Dynamic.Core/Parser/ExpressionParser.cs 87.82% <ø> (+0.92%) ⬆️
src/System.Linq.Dynamic.Core/ParsingConfig.cs 100% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 849952f...9bbd793. Read the comment docs.

@StefH StefH changed the title Fixed 'UseDynamicObjectClassForAnonymousTypes' Remove option for 'UseDynamicObjectClassForAnonymousTypes' Feb 26, 2020
@StefH StefH added the bug label Feb 26, 2020
@StefH StefH merged commit a708a28 into master Feb 26, 2020
@StefH StefH deleted the DynamicExpressionParser_UseDynamicForAnTypes branch February 26, 2020 17:53
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant