-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 231
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Fix for parsing Guid and string in the same condition #200
Merged
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
23 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
eca21da
Fix for ParseLambda with itType and resultType: correct order of argu…
4b7d15a
Add references for missing classes
cd4b420
Fix for missing classes: UserState and UserProfileDetails
c7d29f4
Small update on unit-test (no need to check for `DoesNotThrow`)
StefH e6ddce6
add comment to appveyor
StefH 9a5e5e3
Only run SonarScanner on master branch
StefH 02bda33
APPVEYOR_REPO_BRANCH
StefH e77c116
APPVEYOR_PULL_REQUEST_NUMBER
StefH d7d432b
No working unit test for inner double quotes
2c840f8
Fix for inner double quotes
8590347
Merge branch 'master' into pull-requests-branch
OlegNadymov e13c9d1
Using {}
6213fd1
Fix for parsing Guid and string in the same condition
4d6a4d5
Merge branch 'master' into pull-requests-branch
OlegNadymov 43765a3
FIxes after review
10bb5bd
Merge branch 'pull-requests-branch' of https://github.com/OlegNadymov…
a9c93f2
Fixes after review: just add comments and remove empty lines after br…
cc90915
Fix for parsing expression with custom types with implicit convertions
ea0f3bd
Use "string" instead of "var"
1290d20
Remove empty line
53c73ac
Fix for LessGreater (<>) parsing.
d143a0b
Fix for unit test
dc9e24d
Changes according to review
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why introduce the
StaticHelper
class here if you only want to test the<>
operator?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This expression with
Guid constant
instead ofGuid method
was worked correctly before these changes. Therefore for represent bug withmethod
I've introducedStaticHelper
withGetGuid
method. Or do you mean why I didn't create this class like as local class?There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I thought that the <> was not working at all. But I understand from your comment that this was only not working in specific flows?
In that case your test looks good.
Maybe you could add some more comments to explain this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The
<>
was working with constant only.Your
ExpressionParser
has this condition (line 494):Therefore if
right
epxression isConstantExpression
then the <> will be working.But for non-constant and for different types (e.g.
Guid
andGuid?
) will be executed this code (line 531):And before my changes the variable
isEquality
wasfalse
. Therefore into methodCheckAndPromoteOperands
passed argument type astypeof(IRelationalSignatures)
. But typetypeof(IRelationalSignatures)
doesn't have conversion betweenGuid
andGuid?
.Moreover for the
!=
this case was working because for the!=
the variableisEquality
was true:TokenId.ExclamationEqual
is equal to the!=
.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
OK, thanks for the detailed explanation.