Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Deprecate spiderlets #86

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2015
Merged

Deprecate spiderlets #86

merged 1 commit into from
Apr 23, 2015

Conversation

rdowinton
Copy link
Contributor

Updated documentation to mention spiderlets are now deprecated

Updated documentation to mention spiderlets are now deprecated
pablohoffman added a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 23, 2015
@pablohoffman pablohoffman merged commit 9f59ea7 into scrapy:master Apr 23, 2015
@pablohoffman
Copy link
Member

/cc @kalessin

@kalessin
Copy link
Contributor

which is now the substitute?

@kalessin
Copy link
Contributor

also, this entire repository is already deprecated, right?

@pablohoffman
Copy link
Member

there is no substitute, spiderlets won't be supported in portia

@dangra
Copy link
Member

dangra commented Apr 23, 2015

I thought this repo was frozen, why the changes to this repository?

@pablohoffman
Copy link
Member

This was probably just to emphasize that spiderlets are deprecated, for someone that happened to land on that page without seeing that the project was frozen.

I'd be ok about closing this project on github to avoid confusions.

@kalessin
Copy link
Contributor

Yes, +1 to close this project.

@dangra
Copy link
Member

dangra commented Apr 24, 2015

The only thing we can do is remove the repository, there is nothing like a read-only mode in github.

@pablohoffman
Copy link
Member

what if we recreate the repo with just a README file that points to portia?

@dangra
Copy link
Member

dangra commented Apr 27, 2015

or just remove all files in a commit plus README link to portia.

We keep the history but make it clear the repo is closed.

2015-04-27 10:33 GMT-03:00 Pablo Hoffman [email protected]:

what if we recreate the repo with just a README file that points to portia?


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#86 (comment).

@pablohoffman
Copy link
Member

even better, let's do it!

@kalessin
Copy link
Contributor

+1

@pablohoffman
Copy link
Member

done in 47ce5af

@dangra
Copy link
Member

dangra commented Apr 27, 2015

👍

2015-04-27 14:01 GMT-03:00 Pablo Hoffman [email protected]:

done in 47ce5af
47ce5af


Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub
#86 (comment).

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants