Avail DA adapter Integration into rollkit #5
Conversation
chandiniv1
requested review from
Manav-Aggarwal,
gupadhyaya and
tzdybal
as code owners
|
Important Auto Review SkippedReview was skipped due to path filters Files ignored due to path filters (1)
WalkthroughThe project has introduced a new availability data layer, enhancing data storage interactions through submission, retrieval, and validation. It includes a gRPC service for the Changes
Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media? TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (invoked as PR comments)
Additionally, you can add CodeRabbit Configration File (
|
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 10
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to filter (3)
- config.json
- go.mod
- go.sum
Files selected for processing (4)
- README.md (1 hunks)
- avail.go (1 hunks)
- avail_test.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/avail-da/main.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- README.md
Additional comments: 3
avail.go (3)
17-26: The
SubmitRequestandSubmitResponsestructs are well-defined and match the expected JSON structure for the Avail API.38-40: The
Configstruct is simple and contains the necessary fields for configuration. However, ensure that theAppIDandLcURLare validated somewhere in the code before use to prevent misconfiguration issues.45-49: The
AvailDAstruct is correctly implementing theda.DAinterface as indicated by the empty interface assertion on line 59.
|
Thank you ! Can you make sure that the CI passes ? |
chandiniv1
force-pushed
the
chandini/avail-da
branch
from
93244d2 to
dd22e0d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 2
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- avail.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 4
avail.go (4)
17-26: The
SubmitRequestandSubmitResponsestructs are well-defined with appropriate JSON tags.28-36: The
BlocksResponseandDataTransactionsstructs are well-defined with appropriate JSON tags.45-57: The
AvailDAstruct andNewAvailDAfunction are correctly implemented and follow best practices.96-132: The changes to the
Getmethod, including the check for the HTTP response status code, are correctly implemented.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 3
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to filter (2)
- go.mod
- go.sum
Files selected for processing (1)
- avail.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 10
avail.go (10)
3-15: The import section looks clean and well-organized, with no apparent issues.
17-26: The
SubmitRequestandSubmitResponsestructs are well-defined and follow the JSON naming conventions.28-36: The
BlocksResponseandDataTransactionsstructs are properly structured for the expected JSON response.38-41: The
Configstruct is simple and contains necessary configuration fields. Ensure that all required fields are present and that they are documented for clarity.45-49: The
AvailDAstruct is correctly implemented to satisfy theda.DAinterface.51-57: The
NewAvailDAfunction is correctly returning a new instance ofAvailDA. Ensure that the context and configuration are being used correctly throughout the instance's lifecycle.144-148: The
GetIDsmethod still has a TODO comment, as previously noted. This needs to be addressed before merging to ensure the method returns correct and meaningful IDs.151-153: The
Commitmethod is still a stub and returnsnil, as previously noted. This should either be implemented or documented as to why it's returningnil.156-158: The
Validatemethod is also a stub and returnsnil, as previously noted. This should be implemented or have a clear explanation provided.161-165: The
makeIDfunction comment indicates that IDs are not unique. This is a significant issue as non-unique IDs could lead to data integrity problems. This needs to be addressed to ensure that IDs are unique and meaningful.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 1
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files selected for processing (1)
- avail.go (1 hunks)
Additional comments: 8
avail.go (8)
17-26: The
SubmitRequestandSubmitResponsestructs are well-defined for JSON serialization.28-36: The
BlocksResponseandDataTransactionsstructs are well-defined for JSON serialization.38-43: The
Configstruct is well-defined. However, theBlockURLconstant is still hardcoded. As previously mentioned, consider making this configurable to support different environments.45-57: The
AvailDAstruct andNewAvailDAfunction are correctly implemented, with proper context management.61-100: The
Submitmethod logic appears correct. Ensure that error handling is enhanced as previously suggested, possibly by adding more detailed logging or retry mechanisms for transient errors.102-141: The
Getmethod logic appears correct. As previously mentioned, ensure that the method is thoroughly tested, especially the HTTP request and response handling.151-158: The
CommitandValidatemethods are still stubs returningnil. As previously mentioned, these should be implemented or documented to explain why they are stubs.161-165: The
makeIDfunction comment indicates that IDs are not unique, which could lead to data integrity problems. As previously mentioned, this needs to be addressed to ensure that IDs are unique and meaningful.
@nashqueue I have fixed the CI passes |
Welcome to Codecov 🎉Once merged to your default branch, Codecov will compare your coverage reports and display the results in this comment. Thanks for integrating Codecov - We've got you covered ☂️ |
@MSevey I have enabled tests and fixed lint errors, please have a look |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
config.jsonis excluded by:!**/*.json
Files selected for processing (3)
- .github/workflows/test.yml (2 hunks)
- avail.go (1 hunks)
- cmd/avail-da/main.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (3)
- .github/workflows/test.yml
- avail.go
- cmd/avail-da/main.go
chandiniv1
dismissed stale reviews from Manav-Aggarwal, tuxcanfly, and MSevey
via
632575d
chandiniv1
force-pushed
the
chandini/avail-da
branch
from
97f6f4e to
632575d
Compare
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Review Status
Actionable comments generated: 0
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Files ignored due to path filters (1)
go.modis excluded by:!**/*.mod
Files selected for processing (1)
- avail.go (1 hunks)
Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
- avail.go
This PR consist DA adapter for the Avail.
Summary by CodeRabbit
New Features
Documentation
Tests
Chores