-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 418
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Removing LLVM 3.7 support #2063
Comments
I believe we removed 3.6 when homebrew stopped supporting it. I don't believe we made the decision because of the number of LLVM versions that we were supporting. That said, I don't see any reason to continue supporting LLVM 3.7. I think it makes sense to email the user and developer lists and verify no one needs 3.7. If they do, I think it behooves us to find out why 3.7 is required before removing support. |
@SeanTAllen Yes that's right, I didn't remember the whole story correctly. I'll send the email. |
@Praetonus I sent emails and a tweet. I'm in favor of removal but I think its best to make sure no one needs 3.7. |
Ah, I didn't see your email. Thanks. |
@Praetonus no comments on this so far. seems like there are no objections. |
We are in agreement. This can go forward. |
On the most recent sync call we decided to only officially support LLVM 3.9.1. Additionally we are maintaing CI for our experimentally supported LLVM 4 and 5 work. The goal is to get LLVM 4 and 5 issues fixed so they are no longer experimental. Closes #2063
On the most recent sync call we decided to only officially support LLVM 3.9.1. Additionally we are maintaing CI for our experimentally supported LLVM 4 and 5 work. The goal is to get LLVM 4 and 5 issues fixed so they are no longer experimental. Closes #2063
On the most recent sync call we decided to only officially support LLVM 3.9.1. Additionally we are maintaing CI for our experimentally supported LLVM 4 and 5 work. The goal is to get LLVM 4 and 5 issues fixed so they are no longer experimental. Closes #2063
On the most recent sync call we decided to only officially support LLVM 3.9.1. Additionally we are maintaing CI for our experimentally supported LLVM 4 and 5 work. The goal is to get LLVM 4 and 5 issues fixed so they are no longer experimental. Closes #2063
We're currently in the process of adding support for LLVM 4. When we added LLVM 3.9, we removed support of LLVM 3.6 soon after. The motivation for that was that the burden of maintaining as many LLVM versions was deemed to high.
By this logic, we should remove LLVM 3.7 once LLVM 4 is in.
@ponylang/committer Any objections?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: