Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add missing #defines for sparc. #178

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 28, 2025

Conversation

fabiangreffrath
Copy link
Contributor

No description provided.

#define LDCOEFF_16BIT
#define WINDOWTABLE_16BIT

#elif defined(__sparc__)
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Isn't this the exact same condition as above? Same thing for s390x below.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sorry, this came in twice somehow. I'll fix it in a minute...

Co-Authored-By: Romain Beauxis <[email protected]>
@fabiangreffrath fabiangreffrath changed the title Add missing #defines for sparc and s390x. Add missing #defines for sparc. Feb 28, 2025
@fabiangreffrath
Copy link
Contributor Author

And indeed, s390x was already added here:
c16d5d7

@fabiangreffrath
Copy link
Contributor Author

The original patch was applied to the v2.0.2 Debian package and applied to v2.0.3 without fuzz. I thought I'd rather file the changes here, but must have missed that (parts of it) have already been added.

@mstorsjo mstorsjo merged commit e274a95 into mstorsjo:master Feb 28, 2025
@mstorsjo
Copy link
Owner

Thanks!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants