Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[libxml, libxslt] Match the default features to the upstream default #44633

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Apr 3, 2025

Conversation

saschanaz
Copy link
Contributor

@saschanaz saschanaz commented Mar 26, 2025

Fixes #44627
Fixes #44628

  • Changes comply with the maintainer guide.
  • SHA512s are updated for each updated download.
  • The "supports" clause reflects platforms that may be fixed by this new version.
  • Any fixed CI baseline entries are removed from that file.
  • Any patches that are no longer applied are deleted from the port's directory.
  • The version database is fixed by rerunning ./vcpkg x-add-version --all and committing the result.
  • Only one version is added to each modified port's versions file.

@LilyWangLL LilyWangLL added the category:port-feature The issue is with a library, which is requesting new capabilities that didn’t exist label Mar 27, 2025
@LilyWangLL
Copy link
Contributor

/azp run

Copy link

Azure Pipelines successfully started running 1 pipeline(s).

@LilyWangLL
Copy link
Contributor

Could you please merge master to your commit?

git remote add upstream https://github.com/microsoft/vcpkg.git
git pull upstream master
git push origin libxml2

@LilyWangLL
Copy link
Contributor

You need rerun command ./vcpkg x-add-version --all and push to branch libxml2 to resolve the baseline error.

@LilyWangLL LilyWangLL added the info:reviewed Pull Request changes follow basic guidelines label Apr 2, 2025
@vicroms vicroms merged commit b375dba into microsoft:master Apr 3, 2025
18 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
category:port-feature The issue is with a library, which is requesting new capabilities that didn’t exist info:reviewed Pull Request changes follow basic guidelines
Projects
None yet
3 participants