Added coverage reporting

[sseraj]

Purpose

Added codecov coverage. I also added a few entries to the gitignore file.

Type of change

What types of change is it?
Select the appropriate type(s) that describe this PR

• Bugfix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (non-backwards-compatible fix or feature)
• Code style update (formatting, renaming)
• Refactoring (no functional changes, no API changes)
• Documentation update
• Maintenance update
• Other (please describe)

Testing

Explain the steps needed to test the new code to verify that it does indeed address the issue and produce the expected behavior.

Checklist

Put an x in the boxes that apply.

• I have run flake8 and black to make sure the code adheres to PEP-8 and is consistently formatted
• I have run unit and regression tests which pass locally with my changes
• I have added new tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• I have added necessary documentation

[codecov]

Codecov Report

❗ No coverage uploaded for pull request base (master@95a103e). Click here to learn what that means.
The diff coverage is n/a.

@@            Coverage Diff            @@
##             master      #31   +/-   ##
=========================================
  Coverage          ?   60.55%           
=========================================
  Files             ?        5           
  Lines             ?     1610           
  Branches          ?        0           
=========================================
  Hits              ?      975           
  Misses            ?      635           
  Partials          ?        0           

---

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 95a103e...1cfcbc3. Read the comment docs.

[akleb]

Are we doing this on all our repos now?

[sseraj]

I think so because it's necessary for codecov to work properly.

[ewu63]

I'm fairly certain that we don't need to do this (it's kinda silly to enforce all coverage testing to be installed in developer mode) but I haven't had time to figure out how to do it otherwise.