Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

WIP 071-ppips rewrite attempt using RapidWright #2068

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

hansfbaier
Copy link
Collaborator

This is a proof of concept rewrite of the 071-ppips fuzzer using exclusively the ppip data from RapidWright.
Note that the output is considerably smaller than the previous fuzzer,
obviously missing important pieces like below:
image

@hansfbaier
Copy link
Collaborator Author

The tests of course will all fail, because rapidwright is not available in the CI.
Thus, here is a sample of the results for artix7:
rapidwright-ppips-artix7.tar.gz

@mithro
Copy link
Contributor

mithro commented Dec 7, 2022

Until this data is available through Xilinx in the FPGA Interchange format (https://antmicro.com/blog/2021/09/fpga-interchange-format/), we need to continue to maintain a version of fuzzer which demonstrates the ability to get this data from Vivado (even if a faster version is available through using RapidWright).

BTW You might want to checkout the prjuray fuzzers -- They were written after learning a lot from prjxray and probably a lot cleaner.

@hansfbaier
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@mithro OK, thanks for the info. Will close this PR.

@hansfbaier hansfbaier closed this Dec 7, 2022
@mithro
Copy link
Contributor

mithro commented Dec 7, 2022

@hansfbaier - We can have a "fast" version that uses RapidWright but we will still need to continue to maintain an equivalent version that uses only Vivadio.

@hansfbaier
Copy link
Collaborator Author

@mithro Not necessary. This is not a priority for me now, as it seemed to break PnR tools as the output was almost an order of magnitude less.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants