[fix](delete) Fix static type dispatch by mistake due to typo (#42260)

[TangSiyang2001]

What problem does this PR solve?

Problem Summary:

DeletePredicatePB should be DeleteSubPredicatePB.

Test case is too ambiguous to add, since this bug is triggered by a huge random test and failed to find the minimal case. However, this fix is verified under the wild test that it does works.

Note that this problem may be triggered by another bug, cuz schema in delete predicate rowset should contain column referred in delete condition. Even if we don't have this fix, this error should never happend.

But this error occurred under wild tests, means that schema in delete predicate rowset is not adaptable with delete condition. I think it is under some status that delete operation use BE tablet schema rather than schema from FE, and the former rename operation result in that status. But I failed to add a test case to reproduce, and think that by no way will it happend occurding to the related code.

(1105, 'errCode = 2, detailMessage = ([172.20.50.7](http://172.20.50.7/))[INTERNAL_ERROR]failed to initialize storage reader. tablet=78026, res=[INTERNAL_ERROR]column not found, name=loc1, table_id=-1, schema_version=2

\t0#  doris::TabletSchema::column(std::__cxx11::basic_string<char, std::char_traits<char>, std::allocator<char> > const&) const at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/common/status.h:375
\t1#  doris::Status doris::DeleteHandler::_parse_column_pred<doris::DeleteSubPredicatePB>(std::shared_ptr<doris::TabletSchema>, std::shared_ptr<doris::TabletSchema>, google::protobuf::RepeatedPtrField<doris::DeleteSubPredicatePB> const&, doris::DeleteConditions*) at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/util/expected.hpp:1986
\t2#  doris::DeleteHandler::init(std::shared_ptr<doris::TabletSchema>, std::vector<std::shared_ptr<doris::RowsetMeta>, std::allocator<std::shared_ptr<doris::RowsetMeta> > > const&, long) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:701
\t3#  doris::TabletReader::_init_delete_condition(doris::TabletReader::ReaderParams const&) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:701
\t4#  doris::TabletReader::_init_params(doris::TabletReader::ReaderParams const&) at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/common/status.h:499
\t5#  doris::TabletReader::init(doris::TabletReader::ReaderParams const&) at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/common/status.h:499
\t6#  doris::vectorized::BlockReader::init(doris::TabletReader::ReaderParams const&) at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/common/status.h:499
\t7#  doris::vectorized::NewOlapScanner::open(doris::RuntimeState*) at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/common/status.h:499
\t8#  doris::vectorized::ScannerScheduler::_scanner_scan(std::shared_ptr<doris::vectorized::ScannerContext>, std::shared_ptr<doris::vectorized::ScanTask>) at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/common/status.h:388
\t9#  std::_Function_handler<void (), doris::vectorized::ScannerScheduler::submit(std::shared_ptr<doris::vectorized::ScannerContext>, std::shared_ptr<doris::vectorized::ScanTask>)::$_1::operator()() const::{lambda()#1}>::_M_invoke(std::_Any_data const&) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/bin/../lib/gcc/x86_64-linux-gnu/11/../../../../include/c++/11/bits/shared_ptr_base.h:701
\t10# doris::ThreadPool::dispatch_thread() at /home/zcp/repo_center/doris_master/doris/be/src/util/threadpool.cpp:0
\t11# doris::Thread::supervise_thread(void*) at /var/local/ldb-toolchain/bin/../usr/include/pthread.h:562
\t12# ?
\t13# ?
, backend=[172.20.50.7](http://172.20.50.7/)')

auto tablet_schema = std::make_shared<TabletSchema>();
    tablet_schema->copy_from(*tablet->tablet_schema());
    if (!request.columns_desc.empty() && request.columns_desc[0].col_unique_id >= 0) {
        tablet_schema->clear_columns();
        // TODO(lhy) handle variant
        for (const auto& column_desc : request.columns_desc) {
            tablet_schema->append_column(TabletColumn(column_desc));
        }
    }
    RowsetSharedPtr rowset_to_add;
    // writes
    res = _convert_v2(tablet, &rowset_to_add, tablet_schema, push_type);
    if (!res.ok()) {
        LOG(WARNING) << "fail to convert tmp file when realtime push. res=" << res
                     << ", failed to process realtime push."
                     << ", tablet=" << tablet->tablet_id()
                     << ", transaction_id=" << request.transaction_id;

        Status rollback_status = _engine.txn_manager()->rollback_txn(request.partition_id, *tablet,
                                                                     request.transaction_id);
        // has to check rollback status to ensure not delete a committed rowset
        if (rollback_status.ok()) {
            _engine.add_unused_rowset(rowset_to_add);
        }
        return res;
    }

    // add pending data to tablet

    if (push_type == PushType::PUSH_FOR_DELETE) {
        rowset_to_add->rowset_meta()->set_delete_predicate(std::move(del_preds.front()));
        del_preds.pop();
    }

Release note

Make delete predicate work with column uid correctly.

Check List (For Author)

• Test

  • Regression test
  • Unit Test
  • Manual test (add detailed scripts or steps below)
  • No need to test or manual test. Explain why:
    • This is a refactor/code format and no logic has been changed.
    • Previous test can cover this change.
    • No code files have been changed.
    • Other reason

• Behavior changed:

  • No.
  • Yes.

• Does this need documentation?

  • No.
  • Yes.

Check List (For Reviewer who merge this PR)

• Confirm the release note
• Confirm test cases
• Confirm document
• Add branch pick label

[doris-robot]

Thank you for your contribution to Apache Doris.
Don't know what should be done next? See How to process your PR.

Please clearly describe your PR:

1. What problem was fixed (it's best to include specific error reporting information). How it was fixed.
2. Which behaviors were modified. What was the previous behavior, what is it now, why was it modified, and what possible impacts might there be.
3. What features were added. Why was this function added?
4. Which code was refactored and why was this part of the code refactored?
5. Which functions were optimized and what is the difference before and after the optimization?

[TangSiyang2001]

run buildall

[github-actions]

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

[TangSiyang2001]

run buildall

[github-actions]

clang-tidy review says "All clean, LGTM! 👍"

[doris-robot]

TeamCity be ut coverage result:
Function Coverage: 36.32% (9474/26084)
Line Coverage: 27.87% (77993/279808)
Region Coverage: 26.53% (40001/150773)
Branch Coverage: 23.32% (20317/87132)
Coverage Report: http://coverage.selectdb-in.cc/coverage/5ef105c935dce07d09c15a5ebc71d2e277b940e1_5ef105c935dce07d09c15a5ebc71d2e277b940e1/report/index.html