[16.0][IMP] purchase_request: Define analytic_distribution field hidden by default #2611
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
"Optional" wording is misleading. It's simply hidden by default. |
…default Define analytic_distribution field hidden by default similar to line tree view TT55563
victoralmau
force-pushed
the
16.0-imp-purchase_request-TT55563
branch
from
f3f8b05 to
5f06aee
Compare
victoralmau
changed the title
carlos-lopez-tecnativa
approved these changes
Mar 17, 2025
pedrobaeza
reviewed
Mar 17, 2025
|
This PR looks fantastic, let's merge it! |
|
Congratulations, your PR was merged at 24fbdfd. Thanks a lot for contributing to OCA. ❤️ |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Define
analytic_distributionfield hidden by default similar to line tree view (purchase-workflow/purchase_request/views/purchase_request_line_view.xml
Line 46 in b4670f4
Please @carlos-lopez-tecnativa can you review it?
@Tecnativa TT55563