Add NoResponse option

[zalenskivolt]

see IANA CoAP Option Numbers

#	Option	RFC
258	No-Response	[RFC7967 No Server Response][RFC8613 OSCORE]

[twyatt]

I really appreciate the abundance of tests, but I'd like to move away from tests in this file.
As these tests include details about how the page is rendered, which makes these tests delicate.

[zalenskivolt]

I mostly wanted to test the string rendering of the option, but maybe that could be its own much smaller test?

could add tests for all options in MessageTest.kt perhaps?

[twyatt]

could add tests for all options in MessageTest.kt perhaps?

That seems like a good home for that. 👍

[zalenskivolt]

added in #340 for existing options

[twyatt]

Great job on this! 💯

Some changes I've made:

• promoted RFC links documentation block to a KDoc for Option and reformatted so it renders nicely in the IDE (see screenshot below)
• added syntax sugar for specifying the responses "not interested in" (see tests for usage examples)

[codecov]

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 88.23529% with 2 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 59.96%. Comparing base (b3f0d52) to head (4c1f45e).
Report is 1 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines	Patch %	Lines
koap-core/src/commonMain/kotlin/Message.kt	86.66%	1 Missing and 1 partial ⚠️

Additional details and impacted files

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #332      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.91%   59.96%   +1.05%     
==========================================
  Files           8        8              
  Lines         645      662      +17     
  Branches      146      148       +2     
==========================================
+ Hits          380      397      +17     
+ Misses        228      217      -11     
- Partials       37       48      +11     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:

• ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
• 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

[twyatt]

Although somewhat awkward naming, I went with NotInterestedIn because Suppress clashes with kotlin.Suppress (and would've made usage cumbersome — potentially requiring import aliasing to use).

[zalenskivolt]

it matches the RFC nomenclature as well. "Not interested in 2.xx responses.". It uses "disinterest" in 13 places, but "not interested in" is clearer.

[zalenskivolt]

• promoted RFC links documentation block to a KDoc for Option and reformatted so it renders nicely in the IDE (see screenshot below)

I kind of liked having those short descriptions next to the RFC numbers, so you can spot at a glance what the RFC is about. (But nobody seems to do that anywhere. It made the long list of options much more easy to group by subject!)

[twyatt]

I kind of liked having those short descriptions next to the RFC numbers, so you can spot at a glance what the RFC is about. (But nobody seems to do that anywhere. It made the long list of options much more easy to group by subject!)

Ya, I did like it, but a lot of the time it was repeating the name (found in column 1), so it felt a little redundant. 🤷
I'm open to changing it back if you feel strongly about it.

[zalenskivolt]

I kind of liked having those short descriptions next to the RFC numbers, so you can spot at a glance what the RFC is about. (But nobody seems to do that anywhere. It made the long list of options much more easy to group by subject!)

Ya, I did like it, but a lot of the time it was repeating the name (found in column 1), so it felt a little redundant. 🤷 I'm open to changing it back if you feel strongly about it.

I can do a separate PR and compare side-to-side 😄

I tried this, to have links of uniform length and just text for description and section number:

There are only 5 options that do not share RFC with other options (Observe, OSCORE, Hop-Limit, EDHOC, No-Response), and they are even well spread out (so not too distracting).

I tried this

this version is in: zalenskivolt#1