Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Log which user enabled expert mode #5687

Open
arnaudsjs opened this issue Mar 10, 2023 · 3 comments
Open

Log which user enabled expert mode #5687

arnaudsjs opened this issue Mar 10, 2023 · 3 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@arnaudsjs
Copy link
Contributor

arnaudsjs commented Mar 10, 2023

Depends on: inmanta/web-console#4594

@arnaudsjs arnaudsjs added the enhancement New feature or request label Mar 10, 2023
@sanderr sanderr added tiny Tiny issues and removed tiny Tiny issues labels Mar 21, 2023
@sanderr
Copy link
Contributor

sanderr commented Mar 21, 2023

Probably best to implement this using ContextVar.

1 similar comment
@sanderr
Copy link
Contributor

sanderr commented Mar 21, 2023

Probably best to implement this using ContextVar.

@arnaudsjs arnaudsjs self-assigned this Mar 30, 2023
@arnaudsjs
Copy link
Contributor Author

The JWT tokens created by the Inmanta server currently don't include any information regarding the user where the token belongs to. It would be good to include the user in the same way in the token as Keycloak does it. The integration with Keycloak is currently broken when SSL is enabled on the Inmanta server (See: inmanta/web-console#4594). It was decided together with Bart to postpone the implementation of this ticket until the integration with Keycloak is fully working and we have a better view regarding the structure of the payload of the tokens created by Keycloak.

@arnaudsjs arnaudsjs removed their assignment Mar 31, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants