Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

ICE Normalization for HiC Dataset Comparison #28

Open
hanbinlu opened this issue Nov 2, 2016 · 1 comment
Open

ICE Normalization for HiC Dataset Comparison #28

hanbinlu opened this issue Nov 2, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@hanbinlu
Copy link

hanbinlu commented Nov 2, 2016

I am thinking how should I do if I want to compare 2 experiments with different sequence depths. Here is two ways come up to me but I am not sure whether they are correct:

  1. Set the total_counts parameter of each experiments's normalization be the same. Then I can compare the normalized counts of them?

  2. Output the bias of each experiment. And transform the raw count map into probability matrix by calculating Tij=Oij/BiBj. Is this calculation for probability matrix correct? Or there is some ways to calculate the probability matrix from the output normalized count matrix?

Thanks

@NelleV
Copy link
Contributor

NelleV commented Sep 9, 2017

Hi @sf-nevermore
I am terribly sorry: I am only just seeing this ticket.
For comparing two contact maps, I'd suggest using a differential analysis tool. A couple have been published for Hi-C data and they should deal with sequencing depths differences.

Thanks,
Nelle

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants