Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fluid.ampslice~/fluid.ampgate~ default parameters #2

Open
rconstanzo opened this issue May 16, 2020 · 13 comments
Open

fluid.ampslice~/fluid.ampgate~ default parameters #2

rconstanzo opened this issue May 16, 2020 · 13 comments
Labels
enhancement New feature or request

Comments

@rconstanzo
Copy link

As per this thread on the forum:
https://discourse.flucoma.org/t/fluid-ampslice-fluid-ampgate-default-parameters/475

The default parameters for fluid.ampslice~ and fluid.ampgate~ are not in line with the other Max objects in they have default parameters that never produce results with any incoming signal. They should at minimum be in the ballpark of useful figures, potentially from the "musical example" tabs from each helpfile.

@weefuzzy weefuzzy transferred this issue from flucoma/flucoma-max May 16, 2020
@weefuzzy weefuzzy added the enhancement New feature or request label May 16, 2020
@weefuzzy
Copy link
Member

Transferred as this is not specific to Max.

@tremblap
Copy link
Member

I would mark as invalid, since there is no way to agree what default should be.

@rconstanzo

This comment has been minimized.

@tremblap
Copy link
Member

I think we can all agree that they shouldn't be what they are now!

nope. The current default is what I think is the best. Good luck trying to convince me otherwise, but by saying it is obvious won't cut it :)

@rconstanzo
Copy link
Author

How do you decide what the defaults for each object are? Is it random? Because that is currently the situation.

Some objects, most objects in fact, have defaults that produce results for a fair amount of material. These two do not.

Screenshot 2020-05-16 at 2 05 34 pm

Nothing can satisfy this criteria. Like literally.

Why is this object different from every other object in the toolbox?

@tremblap
Copy link
Member

Is it random? Because that is currently the situation.

I get from this 'exchange' that you are (rudely) saying you don't understand the decisions. Good to know in all cases.

@rconstanzo

This comment has been minimized.

@weefuzzy
Copy link
Member

Right, I'm calling timeout here. I think we've already agreed in the linked thread to talk this over between ourselves, and the conversation here immediately went in a less productive direction.

I can see the general point but, fair warning, it might still be a won't-fix.

@rconstanzo
Copy link
Author

Yeah my bad. I just moved it onto github since this is the place for issues now.

@tremblap
Copy link
Member

my bad too. grumpy day it seems. sorry all.

@weefuzzy
Copy link
Member

Big ❤️ all round. It's useful to have it as a feature request here.

@rconstanzo
Copy link
Author

I hadn't checked the default params of fluid.ampslice~ in ages, but when making a new patch to test with the other day I realized it's still the same as my screenshot above.

It would be great if it had some default params that could do something on any bit of audio. (mainly so when I instantiate a new one, I can use those points to start messing with, rather than having go figure out the domain of numbers necessary)

@rconstanzo
Copy link
Author

rconstanzo commented Mar 9, 2022

I volunteer the following as an ok set of "generic" values.

fluid.ampslice~ @fastrampup 10 @fastrampdown 1000 @slowrampup 4410 @slowrampdown 4410 @floor -70 @onthreshold 15 @offthreshold 10 @highpassfreq 80

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
enhancement New feature or request
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants