Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

SDTH should file be abstracted? #3

Open
DanSmith opened this issue Sep 20, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

SDTH should file be abstracted? #3

DanSmith opened this issue Sep 20, 2024 · 1 comment

Comments

@DanSmith
Copy link
Contributor

Database, endpoint, etc are all similar concepts. Should file be more generalized?

@altergc
Copy link
Collaborator

altergc commented Sep 20, 2024

For background, this question arose from a discussion with colleagues at Making-Sense (https://making-sense.info/), who are looking at using SDTH to describe the operations in a VTL (https://sdmx.org/?page_id=5096) script. VTL distinguishes between persistent and transient datasets. However, VTL considers a dataset persistent if it is transferred from one VTL script to another. Since this transfer could happen entirely in silica, a VTL persistent dataset may never exist on a permanent storage device.

SDTH assumes that a FileInstance is not in in computer memory, because it must be Loaded to be used and Saved. In contrast, a DataframeInstance is transient, because it will disappear when execution of the script ends.

"File" implies a storage device. Should we use a more general concept that is more consistent with VTL?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants