-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 16
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Updated benchmarking #49
Comments
I also got curious and re-ran benchmarks. I'll update the readme accordingly. Since you mentioned TinyUFO benchmarks. Last time I checked, its performance benchmarks were very artificial, as it tested tiny caches with very high hit rates, so I'd take those with a much larger pinch of salt than Mokabench. Since you also mentioned Stretto. It performs poorly mokabench results (arguably broken). That's why I didn't include it in the README in the past. I suggest looking closely at its claims if you plan to use it. Let me know if I can clarify anything.
|
Hello,
I was just wondering if you had done any benchmarking with mokabench since what is on the readme is over a year old or if you were planning on updating the readme with new benches data?
I noticed that you've updated a few versions since then and mokabench now has tinyufo from Cloudflare and another cache called Stretto. I haven't gotten to try running the mokabench yet but the newer versions of QC are pretty competitive when running them in the TinyUFO benches.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: