You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The GBIF index holds data covering >100 years.
When you query the GBIF index you don't include a year filter, and you only page 3 times (of 300 results each). I'd suggest considering adding a &year>1980 or similar to the filter to get the latest data.
I'd also suggest considering something like 10 pages of 250 records by using &limit=250
or more pages. 900 is both somewhat bizarre and quite low - ideally the user should be able to increase to a very large amount.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thanks for the suggestion, we will have a look into setting a year in our query.
Regarding the limit we have a task on our todo list to allow subsequent searches for the next pages of the results. We are limiting to 900 to avoid overwhelming the user's browser/machine. But this was specified a few years back, we are confident that we can increase this limit. So it's in our radar to do so.
Thanks again! :) And feel free to send any other suggestions!
The GBIF index holds data covering >100 years.
When you query the GBIF index you don't include a year filter, and you only page 3 times (of 300 results each). I'd suggest considering adding a
&year>1980
or similar to the filter to get the latest data.I'd also suggest considering something like 10 pages of 250 records by using
&limit=250
or more pages. 900 is both somewhat bizarre and quite low - ideally the user should be able to increase to a very large amount.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: