Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rule tuning: AWS Attached Malicious Lambda Layer should be informational/low and renamed #5235

Open
nickatrecon opened this issue Mar 17, 2025 · 1 comment
Assignees
Labels
False-Positive Issue reporting a false positive with one of the rules

Comments

@nickatrecon
Copy link

Rule UUID

97fbabf8-8e1b-47a2-b7d5-a418d2b95e3d

Example EventLog

N/A

Description

The rule alerts on calls to UpdateFunctionConfiguration, which does not imply maliciousness as the title suggests. This happens every time an authenticated user creates a new Lambda layer, which is a relatively common occurrence for developers in AWS. The rule lists this scenario as a false positive, but it is the significantly more common scenario than the perceived threat and results in significant noise during development. This rule should be named AWS New Lambda Layer Attached and the level be set to informational or low.

Based on my research this threat is limited to a proof of concept. This could be added as a reference.

@nickatrecon nickatrecon added the False-Positive Issue reporting a false positive with one of the rules label Mar 17, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @nickatrecon 👋

It looks like this is your first issue on the Sigma rules repository!

The following repository accepts issues related to false positives or 'rule ideas'.

If you're reporting an issue related to the pySigma library please consider submitting it here

If you're reporting an issue related to the deprecated sigmac library please consider submitting it here

Thanks for taking the time to open this issue, and welcome to the Sigma community! 😃

@nickatrecon nickatrecon changed the title Rule tuning: AWS Attached Malicious Lambda Layer should be informational and renamed Rule tuning: AWS Attached Malicious Lambda Layer should be informational/low and renamed Mar 17, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
False-Positive Issue reporting a false positive with one of the rules
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants