You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
As pointed out by @larsks, the rates.yaml now contains not only SU rates, but a variety of other types of metadata, making it impossible to use without substantial external knowledge (such as what types of SUs are available? what kind of resources of they have? etc) This has forced us to hardcode certain information in our billing repos (i.e the list of SUs in Openstack billing), increasing our maintenance burden whenever we introduce another SU type.
As suggested by @larsks, we should see how the rates.yaml file can be restructured.
@naved001 I remember last week you did mention that certain cluster-specific information (i.e the mapping between SUs and their resource names on the actual Openstack cluster and what appears in invoices) may still need to hardcoded in their respective billing repos. I think that information can be also be put in rates.yaml, at the cost of making the data structure much more complex.
As pointed out by @larsks, the
rates.yaml
now contains not only SU rates, but a variety of other types of metadata, making it impossible to use without substantial external knowledge (such as what types of SUs are available? what kind of resources of they have? etc) This has forced us to hardcode certain information in our billing repos (i.e the list of SUs in Openstack billing), increasing our maintenance burden whenever we introduce another SU type.As suggested by @larsks, we should see how the
rates.yaml
file can be restructured.@knikolla @naved001 Let me know your thoughts
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: